<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nuclear Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/</link>
	<description>News And Commentary On Louisiana And National Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hayride &#187; Know More Nukes</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hayride &#187; Know More Nukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>[...] energy is safe.  We have lived to see that Three Mile Island did not result in the dreaded China Syndrome.  Waste disposal, the other elephant in the room, has successfully been addressed by recycling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] energy is safe.  We have lived to see that Three Mile Island did not result in the dreaded China Syndrome.  Waste disposal, the other elephant in the room, has successfully been addressed by recycling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oil – We’re All Addicts &#124; The Hayride</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Oil – We’re All Addicts &#124; The Hayride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>[...] could lessen our dependency on oil as a fuel source for generating electricity by building nuclear facilities, and as a transportation fuel by converting to compressed natural gas, which is cleaner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could lessen our dependency on oil as a fuel source for generating electricity by building nuclear facilities, and as a transportation fuel by converting to compressed natural gas, which is cleaner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hayride &#187; Is He For Real?</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hayride &#187; Is He For Real?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] has finally announced his support for something that makes sense.  Nuclear power is safe, clean, and even carbon friendly.  Why the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has finally announced his support for something that makes sense.  Nuclear power is safe, clean, and even carbon friendly.  Why the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hayride &#187; David Vitter’s (et al) Stimulus Plan</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hayride &#187; David Vitter’s (et al) Stimulus Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-623</guid>
		<description>[...] would create jobs in the energy sector by promoting domestic oil and gas production, streamlining nuclear powerplant construction,  and limiting the EPA’s authority to impose economy-killing mandates that many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would create jobs in the energy sector by promoting domestic oil and gas production, streamlining nuclear powerplant construction,  and limiting the EPA’s authority to impose economy-killing mandates that many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike_Youngblood</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike_Youngblood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Ryan.  Wind and solar generation make for great science fair projects, and may be appropriate for desolate locations that otherwise cannot be served, but otherwise they don&#039;t make sense.  Even suburban residential individual installations don&#039;t begin to become viable until you and I reimburse the owner with an 80% tax credit.  Nuclear is a safe, viable option, the approval of which must be streamlined.  That won&#039;t happen until the misinformed and hysterical public is better educated on the subject, and that was my motivation for the post. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Ryan.  Wind and solar generation make for great science fair projects, and may be appropriate for desolate locations that otherwise cannot be served, but otherwise they don&#039;t make sense.  Even suburban residential individual installations don&#039;t begin to become viable until you and I reimburse the owner with an 80% tax credit.  Nuclear is a safe, viable option, the approval of which must be streamlined.  That won&#039;t happen until the misinformed and hysterical public is better educated on the subject, and that was my motivation for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike_Youngblood</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike_Youngblood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Ryan.  Wind and solar generation make for great science fair projects, and may be appropriate for desolate locations that otherwise cannot be served, but otherwise they don&#039;t make sense.  Even suburban residential individual installations don&#039;t begin to become viable until you and I reimburse the owner with an 80% tax credit.  Nuclear is a safe, viable option, the approval of which must be streamlined.  That won&#039;t happen until the misinformed and hysterical public is better educated on the subject, and that was my motivation for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Ryan.  Wind and solar generation make for great science fair projects, and may be appropriate for desolate locations that otherwise cannot be served, but otherwise they don&#039;t make sense.  Even suburban residential individual installations don&#039;t begin to become viable until you and I reimburse the owner with an 80% tax credit.  Nuclear is a safe, viable option, the approval of which must be streamlined.  That won&#039;t happen until the misinformed and hysterical public is better educated on the subject, and that was my motivation for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Booth</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Great post, Mike.  Back in 1998, I actually spent a month studying solar and wind power at Solar Energy International in Carbondale, CO.  While there have been technological advancements since then, there is still no way that large-scale solar and wind can provide more than a fraction of the power we need.   And even if efficiency dramatically improves, they still won&#039;t be practical due to their natural unpredictability. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Mike.  Back in 1998, I actually spent a month studying solar and wind power at Solar Energy International in Carbondale, CO.  While there have been technological advancements since then, there is still no way that large-scale solar and wind can provide more than a fraction of the power we need.   And even if efficiency dramatically improves, they still won&#039;t be practical due to their natural unpredictability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Booth</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2009/12/the-nuclear-option-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=564#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>Great post, Mike.  Back in 1998, I actually spent a month studying solar and wind power at Solar Energy International in Carbondale, CO.  While there have been technological advancements since then, there is still no way that large-scale solar and wind can provide more than a fraction of the power we need.   And even if efficiency dramatically improves, they still won&#039;t be practical due to their natural unpredictability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Mike.  Back in 1998, I actually spent a month studying solar and wind power at Solar Energy International in Carbondale, CO.  While there have been technological advancements since then, there is still no way that large-scale solar and wind can provide more than a fraction of the power we need.   And even if efficiency dramatically improves, they still won&#039;t be practical due to their natural unpredictability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

