<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Response To The Tebow Super Bowl Ad&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/</link>
	<description>News And Commentary On Louisiana And National Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I read an article about this business and somebody who was the leader of some group or another made the comment about the ad being &quot;divisive&quot;. I thought that was rather hilarious. Isn&#039;t it strange how these abortion proponents always call anybody or anything &quot;divisive&quot; that challenges the notion that a helpless baby being torn from it&#039;s mother&#039;s body is somehow a good thing. Go figure.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about this business and somebody who was the leader of some group or another made the comment about the ad being &quot;divisive&quot;. I thought that was rather hilarious. Isn&#039;t it strange how these abortion proponents always call anybody or anything &quot;divisive&quot; that challenges the notion that a helpless baby being torn from it&#039;s mother&#039;s body is somehow a good thing. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>I read an article about this business and somebody who was the leader of some group or another made the comment about the ad being &quot;divisive&quot;. I thought that was rather hilarious. Isn&#039;t it strange how these abortion proponents always call anybody or anything &quot;divisive&quot; that challenges the notion that a helpless baby being torn from it&#039;s mother&#039;s body is somehow a good thing. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about this business and somebody who was the leader of some group or another made the comment about the ad being &quot;divisive&quot;. I thought that was rather hilarious. Isn&#039;t it strange how these abortion proponents always call anybody or anything &quot;divisive&quot; that challenges the notion that a helpless baby being torn from it&#039;s mother&#039;s body is somehow a good thing. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaoidh</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>macaoidh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-532</guid>
		<description>So because the issue is polarizing and complex Tim Tebow isn&#039;t allowed to have a say in it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So because the issue is polarizing and complex Tim Tebow isn&#039;t allowed to have a say in it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaoidh</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>macaoidh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>So because the issue is polarizing and complex Tim Tebow isn&#039;t allowed to have a say in it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So because the issue is polarizing and complex Tim Tebow isn&#039;t allowed to have a say in it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Booth</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-531</guid>
		<description>The argument is essentially that Focus on the Family is bad, so they should have their 1st Amendment rights taken away from them as a result. 
 
I&#039;m quite sure that CBS hates this, but they&#039;ve made the smart choice here.  They know that having Tim Tebow lead a popular movement against the network would have been devastating, and they probably could be sued if the ad met all of their guidelines and they refused to air it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is essentially that Focus on the Family is bad, so they should have their 1st Amendment rights taken away from them as a result. </p>
<p>I&#039;m quite sure that CBS hates this, but they&#039;ve made the smart choice here.  They know that having Tim Tebow lead a popular movement against the network would have been devastating, and they probably could be sued if the ad met all of their guidelines and they refused to air it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Booth</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>The argument is essentially that Focus on the Family is bad, so they should have their 1st Amendment rights taken away from them as a result. 
 
I&#039;m quite sure that CBS hates this, but they&#039;ve made the smart choice here.  They know that having Tim Tebow lead a popular movement against the network would have been devastating, and they probably could be sued if the ad met all of their guidelines and they refused to air it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is essentially that Focus on the Family is bad, so they should have their 1st Amendment rights taken away from them as a result. </p>
<p>I&#039;m quite sure that CBS hates this, but they&#039;ve made the smart choice here.  They know that having Tim Tebow lead a popular movement against the network would have been devastating, and they probably could be sued if the ad met all of their guidelines and they refused to air it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanH</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>DanH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-530</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s really retarded is that anyone thinks that this ad, uproar or article will make any difference in the debate. Something this polarizing, and complex, is best not left to athletes and LAGA members to debate. This is another distraction from more important battles. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s really retarded is that anyone thinks that this ad, uproar or article will make any difference in the debate. Something this polarizing, and complex, is best not left to athletes and LAGA members to debate. This is another distraction from more important battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanH</title>
		<link>http://thehayride.com/2010/01/on-the-response-to-the-tebow-super-bowl-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>DanH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehayride.com/?p=1042#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s really retarded is that anyone thinks that this ad, uproar or article will make any difference in the debate. Something this polarizing, and complex, is best not left to athletes and LAGA members to debate. This is another distraction from more important battles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s really retarded is that anyone thinks that this ad, uproar or article will make any difference in the debate. Something this polarizing, and complex, is best not left to athletes and LAGA members to debate. This is another distraction from more important battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

