This option will reset the home page of The Hayride restoring closed widgets and categories.

Reset The Hayride homepage
RSS Feed Facebook twitter

The EPA – Again

 Our neighbors in Texas have found a way to increase refinery and chemical plant production while lowering emissions.  To show appreciation and reward these efforts, the EPA is shutting the program down.

 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has, since 1994, been issuing what it refers to as “flexible permits.”  Rather than measure the emissions of the individual production units within a refinery or chemical complex, they permit and measure the total net emissions of the facility.  EPA claims this permitting process violates the Clean Air Act.

Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX) said

There has been a 22% reduction in ozone and 46% decrease in NOX emissions in Texas since 2000 all while increasing output. From 2000-2009, Texas’ annual refinery operable crude oil distillation capacity increased by 11.9%. There should be a solution that protects the flexible program – which has improved air quality in Texas – without the heavy hand of the federal government.

 

Others have said that the EPA is miffed because Texas found a way to solve a problem on its own, without EPA involvement or worse, approval.

Gov. Rick Perry has suggested that this is but another example of the Obama administration overstepping its authority, noting that Texas will continue to fight the federal takeover and shutdown of a successful state program.  Another argument over state’s rights and the Constitution may be in the making.  As for now, about 125 chemical plants and refineries will have to spend millions of dollars to obtain new permits.

We are left to wonder, as we have wondered regarding the Gulf oil spill – is it the EPA’s quest to clean up the environment, or to shut down an industry?

7 Comments

  1. tarpon says:

    MAybe we should just shut down the EPA.

    • For all they do, there are worse things that could happen. I'll be posting additional evidence of their hyppcracy over the next few days.

    • macaoidh says:

      Without question the EPA should be shut down. Every state in the union has a regulatory body capable of doing exactly what the EPA does, and states are perfectly capable of putting together multi-state compacts to handle issues which affect them on a regional basis. Running a national EPA merely invites grandiose tyranny and provides sinecures for environmentalist kooks.

      The EPA ought to be dismantled this afternoon. It can't go away fast enough.

  2. tarpon says:

    MAybe we should just shut down the EPA.

    • For all they do, there are worse things that could happen. I'll be posting additional evidence of their hyppcracy over the next few days.

    • macaoidh says:

      Without question the EPA should be shut down. Every state in the union has a regulatory body capable of doing exactly what the EPA does, and states are perfectly capable of putting together multi-state compacts to handle issues which affect them on a regional basis. Running a national EPA merely invites grandiose tyranny and provides sinecures for environmentalist kooks.

      The EPA ought to be dismantled this afternoon. It can't go away fast enough.

  3. [...] week we’ve examined how the EPA is punishing Texas and the refining and petro-chemical industries there for implementing methods to reduce emissions.  We have also examined how the ban on [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.