Ten Good Reasons For An Obamacare Repeal
Today, the House of Representatives is voting to repeal the health care law that President Obama enacted last year.
As a practicing physician, I can think of many reasons why this bill is bad for patients, bad for doctors, bad for taxpayers, and needs to be repealed.
Here are ten of the most important:
Destroys Jobs
The estimates vary, but the conclusions are all the same: the bill is a job destroyer. Because of tax hikes, expensive mandates, burdensome regulations, and costly penalties, the Congressional Budget Office predicts that the bill will put at least 650,000 Americans out of work. A separate study conducted by the National Federation of Independent Business, the nation’s leading small business advocacy organization, estimates that 1.6 million workers will lose their jobs because of this bill.
$569.2 Billion Tax Hike
The new law contains 21 separate tax hikes totaling $569.2 billion. Not only will these tax hikes eliminate jobs by making it harder for small businesses to expand and hire, they will increase the cost of health care because many of them target health care goods and services.
Deficits & Debt
With a price tag of over $1 trillion, the law is loaded with budget gimmickry that gives it the appearance of decreasing federal spending, but it is a budget buster. For example, the bill double counts $398 billion it claims in Medicare “savings,” doesn’t count as spending $115 billion that is required to fund its implementation, and ignores hundreds of billions of dollars required to pay doctors and nurses for health care services. According to independent economists at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “national health expenditures under the health reform act would increase by a total of $311 billion during calendar years 2010-2019.”
Higher Health Costs
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicts that health insurance premiums for families buying private health coverage in the private market will increase by $2,100 over the next five years because of this law. CBO also predicts that the law will increase Medicare prescription drug coverage premiums by 9 percent.
Medicaid Explosion
The new law adds nearly 16 million Americans to the Medicaid rolls. Medicaid, a federal-state partnership designed to give low-income Americans access to health care, is already bankrupting states and barely provides access to health care for those who are already on it. In Louisiana, the Medicaid expansion is expected to cost at least $536 million over the first five years, which will leave $536 million less for roads and education.
If You Like Your Plan, You Can [NOT] Keep It
Despite repeated assurances to the contrary, millions of Americans will lose access to their existing health coverage because of this law. In fact, according to independent estimates, as many as 117 million Americans could lose access to their current health insurance plans.
Endangers Seniors’ Access To Health Care
According to economists at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare will be bankrupt within the next ten years. Rather than strengthening Medicare to ensure its solvency, the new law cuts Medicare by $575 billion to pay for other programs. Because of this, CMS economists caution that the bill could jeopardize seniors’ access to care. For example, CMS predicts that at least 1.2 million seniors will lose their Medicare Advantage plan and 9 out of 10 seniors will lose their employer-sponsored retiree Medicare drug coverage.
Individual Mandate
The centerpiece of the new health care law is a provision requiring Americans to purchase a health insurance plan deemed acceptable by the federal government. Twenty-six states have filed suit to overturn this provision, and ultimately the Supreme Court will decide if it is constitutionally permissible for the federal government to require you to purchase something simply because you’re breathing.
“Shall”
As enacted, the new law uses the word “shall” 4,231 times and creates over 150 boards, bureaucracies, and commissions to regulate health care. In the end, the 997-page bill will be dwarfed in size by reams of regulations and rules issued by the bureaucracy. All of this serves to diminish your control over your own health care.
Repeal Means Reform
Rather than reforming health care, the new law simply doubles down on what is driving up health care costs. The key to lowering health care costs is giving patients more control over health care decision-making. By definition, a law that creates over 150 boards, bureaucracies, and commissions does not empower patients. Repealing this law is the first step to enacting real health care reform that lowers costs and expands access to quality health care for all Americans.

Already a hospital in our area is falling into the Obamacare trap. A good friend went to the hospital and they took one look at him and said, “Well, he is OLD.”
Then pretty much dismissed him. He is not ‘old’ by the way, just very, very ill and looks awful. But, their solution was he is old, he doesn’t have enough insurance or medicare so send him home. Sickening……..
I’m watching the debate on C-SPAN, now. Cassidy’s rational arguments are being met with over-the-top, emotional anecdotes. Disgusting…
The Hayride New Post – Ten Good Reasons For An Obamacare Repeal. Read it now at http://bit.ly/g5CF9S
Post updated January 19, 2011 – Ten Good Reasons For An Obamacare Repeal. Read it now at http://bit.ly/g5CF9S
Much of what you say is true but I’m skeptical that your statement that, “the key to lowering costs is giving patients more control over health care decisions.” I don’t see the average American taking control. Instead their doctors are in control. Patients go along like sheep to the slaughter taking every expensive test the doctor tells them to. Doctor’s prescribe brand name drugs when a generic drug would do just as good. I have had a doctor who only prescribes generics tell me that many of their peers write brand name drugs because they are “on the take.” I have had to refuse to take a medication I needed because the doctor only wanted to prescribe a brand drug rather than a generic. He did not care if I could afford it or not. So how are we going to get a handle on rising health costs when some doctors are more concerned about their bottom line than the patient’s I submit to you the only entity strong enough to protect the patient from such doctors is the government. I know you personally have not lived the lifestyle of the average American doctor but you are in the minority. Why do Americans have to pay for the research to invent new brand drugs while the rest of the world buys them for much less. Who is going to protect Americans from that. Why can’t we buy our drugs from Canada. Don’t you suspect there is a very strong lobby group at work there. Maybe Obama Care is not what we need. But the Republican response is not what we need either. We really need people in Congress that will protect the American patient. You seem like a good candidate for that. What do you plan to do to protect us?
The root cause of excess cost, tort reform, is not on the table. Lawsuits encourage doctors to over test and treat. Drug companies inflate their prices in anticipation of the inevitable lawsuit or FDA withdrawal of approval (which stimulates lawsuits). Lawyers, through the politicians they support, have elevated the cost of everything in our society. At the very least, we should have a “looser pays all cost ” lawsuit policy with all contingency lawyers included in who will pay the winner.
Tort reform is not being discussed. It is the root of the problem. The entire health systems over treats and over tests hoping to be able to defend their decisions when the looters come with the inevitable lawsuit. Separate the lawyers from the health care system and everything else will take care of itself.
How about one good reason to repeal the PATRIOT Act that you voted to extend.1.) it’s unconstitutional. You know, that oath you took.
It’s not unconstitutional.