JEFFREY LORD: POLITICO’s Cain Smears Are A High-Tech Lynching, Redux
JEFFREY LORD: POLITICO’s Cain Smears Are A High-Tech Lynching, Redux – American Spectator
This option will reset the home page of The Hayride restoring closed widgets and categories.
Reset The Hayride homepageJEFFREY LORD: POLITICO’s Cain Smears Are A High-Tech Lynching, Redux – American Spectator
This post was written by MacAoidh on Monday, October 31, 2011, 10:26. MacAoidh has written 8079 posts on this blog.
“What happened here was the accumulated karmic backlash of forty years’ worth of Establishment Democrats telling the Activist Left that they were the vanguard of, and spokesmen for, a broad American populist movement. For the longest time, such lies were simply an accepted part of the public policy debate; mostly because the country had no yardstick by which to judge the Left’s turnout and activities.
“But then came the Tea Parties — which showed people what a real American populist movement looks like, and what it can do — and its success stung the Activist Left at the exact moment that Scott Walker came along and not unreasonably decided that if he was elected on a platform of doing certain things, he had best start doing them. This infuriated the Left, but not as much as the refusal of Walker and the WI GOP to go weak-kneed at the first sign of push-back. So… the recall movement was born!
“And… fizzled. The Left should have cut their losses when Prosser demonstrated that drum circles and illegal indoor camping in the Rotunda didn’t translate into votes… and they definitely should have cut their losses when the first wave of recalls didn’t live up to the hype. But they didn’t, and now the people of Wisconsin are increasingly demonstrating that they’re tired of all of this – and they’re not blaming the Republicans, either. Such a shame, but that’s what you get whe- hey! The bacon’s fully cooked.”
- Moe Lane
Bad Behavior has blocked 8107 access attempts in the last 7 days.
This sort of stuff happens all the time. My guess is that Cain was falsely accused of “inappropriate behavior” and the National Restaurant Association, rather than engage in a lengthy, expensive court battle, decided to settle the case and move on. Cain didn’t have presidential aspirations, at the time, and probably thought it a prudent course of action.
Everyone, especially media types like Cain, knows about opposition research. Ergo, at the risk of borrowing trouble, once his campaign started to get traction, he should have brought up the subject in order to have a shot at damage control. If Cain honestly thought the story wouldn’t surface, that demonstrates a troubling lack of good judgment on his part.
In light of that last sentence, I just heard that Cain said, this morning, that he didn’t even know about the Association’s settlement. That doesn’t quite pass the smell test and will keep the story “above the fold” longer than it should be.