On, Wisconsin!
Irony is not lost on history.
In 1959 in Madison, Wisconsin, a group of union organizers formed the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the first public employee union in the United States. Prior to that time, the man whose actions resulted in more private sector unionization than any other president—Franklin Delano Roosevelt—had forbidden public employee unionization, arguing (quite correctly) that it could interfere with the orderly delivery of public services. Shortly after AFSCME was formed, another Democratic president, John F. Kennedy, gave the green light for federal public employee unions to form.
Today, Madison is ground zero in a war between public employee unions and state and local governments teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. The newly elected governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, is putting it all on the line to reverse the trend of unsustainable pension, wage, and health care benefits “negotiated” in the past between the unions and previous governors. Walker fully comprehends what Roosevelt also knew: if public sector unions are allowed to make demands of officials they are instrumental in electing, the taxpayers may effectively have no one at the table looking out for their rights.
Walker has been called a lot of things by the protesting unionists—Hitler, Mubarak, Mussolini—but he has not abandoned his stand. The House and Senate in Wisconsin have strong Republican majorities that were elected last November on a platform of stopping the fiscal madness that had been emanating from Madison. Elections have consequences, as President Obama coldly reminded Republicans in Congress shortly after his inauguration. Obviously some Democrats believe that elections have consequences only when Democrats win. Some 14 Democratic senators bolted Wisconsin for Illinois to prevent a quorum in an attempt to stop Walker’s legislation from passing. (A similar tactic is being used by Democrats in Indiana to prevent the passage of a Right-to-Work law that the unions oppose in that state.)
Delaying tactics aside, this issue is not going to go away. All across America, state and local governments are slashing services because their hands are tied in trying to deal with ever-escalating personnel costs. For example, in Michigan, the Detroit public school system has been ordered to close half of its public schools. Personnel costs are among the biggest budget items in any enterprise, including government. Unfortunately, in many places collective bargaining agreements prevent those items from being on the table when addressing budget deficits.
The war in Wisconsin will not remain there. In Ohio, the Republican governor and GOP-controlled legislature have filed a bill even more far-reaching than Wisconsin’s when it comes to addressing collective bargaining with public employee unions. Other states will follow. The public employee unions—by their demands and tactics—are doing little to engender support among voters and taxpayers. The fact that this process is starting in the upper Midwest that was the cradle for public employee unionization may be ironic but not surprising. In the state, local, and congressional elections last November, incumbent Democrats—many supported and funded heavily by public employee unions—were defeated in droves in that region. Now it is the taxpayers’ turn to have their voices heard and their fiscal frustrations relieved.
The fight song for the University of Wisconsin in Madison contains these lines: “On Wisconsin! On Wisconsin! Raise her glowing flame. Stand fellows now, let us salute her name.”
In state after state where fiscal insanity—in part brought about by runaway public sector collective bargaining—has run amok, many elected officials may soon be saluting the names of Wisconsin and Scott Walker.

The fight in Wisconsin was never really about the budget. It’s about union-busting pure and simple.Governor Walker simply wants to eliminate workers’ rights.
Public sector workers have more rights and protection than any other group. Union busting will be a big step forward for both the public and private sectors. Anyone that believes otherwise needs to spend a few weeks in China. Those guys run circles around our labor force here.
What a stupid statement.
Doesn’t it ever occur to you guys that allowing these unions to bargain with the very people that they can then band together and elect is essentially vote buying? Here is some more benefits, okay, here is our vote en masse.
Why? Do you think Gov. Walker is evil? Does he hate workers? He just wants to eliminate workers rights cause . . . Doesnt it occur to you that the more workers, the more taxes the state collects? Dont you think Gov. Walker might want that result? What does the data show?
If they’re state workers they probably cost the taxpayer a heck of a lot more than the taxes they pay.
Actually, there’s no probably about it. They do – and it’s a lot more.
Perhaps I misunderstood your comment: eliminate workers rights. That sounded like you think Gov. Walker has a desire to return to the 1880s and wants to repeal the child labor laws, etc.
Wisconsin has a civil service regime as well as public employee unions.
Their workers don’t have a shortage of protections regardless of whether
collective bargaining is present.
I have one quibble with Dan’s piece – namely, that the right-to-work bill in Indiana was billed as the reason for the Democrats’ walking out. But when Gov. Mitch Daniels publicly stated it wasn’t on his agenda and that he didn’t agree it should be pushed, and Daniels quickly received the assent of Republican leaders in both houses of the state legislature, the Democrat fleebaggers then produced a list of further demands the satisfaction of which were conditions of their return.
We joined in the conservative chorus hammering Daniels this week for what looked like a public display of weakness. By the weekend, though, the fleebaggers have shown a shabby set of true colors and the governor looks eminently reasonable.