Landry’s Obama Snub Understandable, But It’s An Unforced Error (UPDATED)
The Times-Picayune had the story this morning of U.S. Rep. Jeff Landry’s announcement that he was kissing off an invite to the White House to talk about the budget after last night’s overwhelming defeat of the president’s “clean” bill to raise the debt ceiling.
“I have respectfully declined the president’s invitation to the White House today,” Landry said in a statement. “I don’t intend to spend my morning being lectured to by a president whose failed policies have put our children and grandchildren in a huge burden of debt.”
Landry went further, as the Washington Post quoted him…
“Until the President produces a responsible deficit reduction plan, I’m not going to the White House to negotiate with myself,” he added. “Our conference has put out for months where we would start the process. The President has done nothing, just like he has for the people of the Gulf Coast.”
More than 200 Republican House members made the trip to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., including all five of the other Louisiana Republicans.
As our readers know, we’re huge Landry fans here at the Hayride. He’s a strong conservative and he fights like a wolverine for his district and the state. And based on the history of past encounters between President Obama and GOP House leaders, his sentiments are completely warranted. Dealing with Obama on any substantial level has proven a complete waste of time. The President has repeatedly ignored Congress and attempted to enforce policy through executive fiat which he was not able to get passed through legislative channels, his pronouncements on budget matters are disingenuous and demagogic to a comic extent and the sort of disrespect he’s repeatedly shown to political opponents – as seen in technicolor when he gave Paul Ryan a front-row seat to his own rhetorical evisceration on budgetary matters earlier this year – has disgraced his office.
So we’re very sympathetic to the idea that Landry is giving Obama exactly what he deserves. We don’t like it, though.
For two reasons.
First, it’s off-message. The House GOP has taken the responsible position on the budget by presenting the Ryan plan, and for their trouble they were greeted by unserious and ridiculous Democrat demogoguery. We’ve seen Mediscare 24/7 and we’ve seen absolutely no plan presented by the Dems in response to Ryan’s ideas for bringing the budget into balance.
The latter is where things lie. The Democrats’ approach accusing Ryan of killing old people might be fine for a short-term political bounce, but as time goes by and the public focuses on the fiscal policy debate it’s going to become more and more obvious that while Ryan’s plan might be objectionable to some, at least it’s an attempt to bring the budget back into balance – and that plan represents a serious attempt at governance neither Obama nor his Dem friends on the Hill have made. Over time, that’s going to become the public’s perception of the issue.
But it won’t be if what’s being focused on is some freshman congressman who said mean things about Obama and didn’t go to see him. That’s an easy media story which detracts attention from the substantial debate.
And second, it’s rude – and it’s going to get recognized as such. The Picayune story had this…
Norm Ornstein, long-time congressional scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, suggested Landry was out of line to decline the president’s invitation.
“It is more than a little arrogant,” Ornstein said. “It belittles the office of the presidency and shows that Landry has little understanding of the political process, the role of the constitutional institutions, much less basic politeness.”
That might be over the top, but there’s no doubt the reaction to the snub will move the attention away from the fact Obama is the problem where the budget is concerned and toward this business of these snarling, uncivil Republicans – and Landry will be the new Joe Wilson for his trouble.
It would have been a whole lot smarter had Landry gone to the White House, attempted to score some political points while in the room and then called a press conference to blast away at Obama for his lack of commitment to balancing the budget, his refusal to support an energy policy that doesn’t amount to treason, his dismissive attitude toward a House of Representatives which reflects the majority view of the American people and whatever else he can think up.
Landry’s lucky to an extent, in that Anthony Weiner’s weiner is sucking all the air out of the Washington discussion – so outside of Louisiana nobody will really remember his refusal to meet with the president.
Still, it’s a mistake. He shouldn’t make it again.
UPDATE: At least it sounds like Landry’s characterization in advance of the meeting was spot on. Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL), who also declined to attend, was just on Cavuto saying that his understanding of the meeting was that it lasted an hour, and the majority of that time was filled by Obama giving a speech.
Also, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-Metairie) put out a press release following the meeting to the effect that he pressed Obama on energy policy and got what’s likely to be an empty promise of cooperation…
During a meeting at the White House with House Republicans, Congressman Steve Scalise today asked President Barack Obama to resolve the lack of clarity in the approval process for offshore drilling permits and exploration plans. The President responded that he and his Director of the National Economic Council would work with Scalise to address the problem. Scalise has consistently advocated for the administration to remove roadblocks in the permitting process since the President imposed a moratorium on deepwater drilling.
“After our entire Congressional delegation has pressed for a meeting with President Obama for nearly a year, I was glad to finally have the opportunity to ask the President directly to improve the permitting process so people can get back to work drilling safely in the Gulf of Mexico,” Scalise said. “The facts speak for themselves – more than 13,000 jobs have been lost throughout the region and 12 offshore rigs have left our waters to drill in foreign countries as a result of this administration’s policies. I emphasized to the President the need to lay out a clear path that lets our people get back to work exploring safely for energy in America, and pointed out the roadblocks that have been placed by the Department of Interior and other federal agencies. The President committed to work with me to address problems in the permitting process. I will immediately follow up with the President and his Director of the National Economic Council to give him the opportunity to fulfill his pledge and in return we can create thousands more high-paying American jobs, and strengthen our country’s energy security.”
For nearly a year, Scalise has joined with the entire Louisiana Congressional delegation in asking to meet with the President to discuss the deepwater drilling moratorium, the ongoing permitorium, in both shallow and deepwater, and domestic energy production, but this is the first time the President has personally met with Scalise on the issue.

I went door to door fighting Obama for president and can assure you that there is little that I agree with him on. That being said– he is still the President and Congressman Landry should have visited the Pres when invited because that’s how we behave in our Republic.
Horsecrap! The jackass in the White House has screwed over LA and our industries from day one. HE deserves nothing…..good on ya Rep. Landry….principle over theater!
No Way! I highly disagree! Obama is playing right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook. Thank you Rep. Landry for staying firm and saying NO! That is what we want.
Hurray for Landry! Despite this well reasoned and written article
Meeting with Obama is a dance for the press. No real dialogue planned. Just so he could say, “I tried… I met…. I invited…” Glad to see someone calling the bluff.
So…Obama et al are in the process of throwing out the Constitution and “fundamentally changing this nation”…and those who don’t play the ‘civility’ game are “rude”. Good God Almighty. Brings to mind the movie where Pacino stood up in that faux honorable court and screamed that he’d “take a flamethrower to this place” . This whole thing has went far past rude; it is Obama that is “belittling” the office and the Constitution that he SWORE TO DEFEND. Kudos to Landry!
I wish these misrepresentaives felt as strongly about the PATRIOT Act.
The Patriot Act is important to keep in place right now. Our world is too volitile to not have it in place. I don’t care if I’m being checked out. I want the terrorist activity monitored.
Yesss!!! THIS is what we need! Someone willing to stand up to that idiot!
The Hayride New Post – Landry’s Obama Snub Understandable, But It’s An Unforced Error. Read it now at http://tinyurl.com/44bbzr3
I knew Landry had guts.
Post updated June 1, 2011 – Landry’s Obama Snub Understandable, But It’s An Unforced Error. Read it now at http://tinyurl.com/44bbzr3
Post updated June 1, 2011 – Landry’s Obama Snub Understandable, But It’s An Unforced Error (UP…. Read it now at http://tinyurl.com/44bbzr3
You have to remember that almost all of the “media” today are all fighting for a chance to “sniff the Presidents ###. That’s all they do. Yes Mr President, No Mr President. Most could not write an objective article if their lives depended on it.
I say cudos to Mr. Landry. Maybe if no one showed up to one of the President’s “meetings”, then maybe, just maybe, he would open his thick scull about what the people of this country really want, instead of what he deems is best for this country with his ” Presidential edicts”. He’s RUDE for signing things into law without even consulting the Congress! Now, that’s rudeness of the first order.
I like it. A meeting of 1. That way he indeed can do all the talking and false promises. Wonder if the media would report unanimous agreement?
Expect this to be more of a political stunt for some 2012 election talking point, than to have any effect anywhere else. He gets his five minutes of high fives from his present constituency and that is about it.
Barry has done so much to belittle the office of President (while at the same time concentrating more power in the office than most banana republic dictators have in theirs) that Landry could not denigrate it any further.
It’s time that all repubs refuse to meet with Barry until AFTER he and the smarmy little weasel from Nevada have presented their proposal for reducing the debt. Only then can face to face negotiations begin with any seriousness. Anything else is just a photo op to make Obama look like he works for a living.
The Hayride is off basis regarding Rep. Landry. I do not find him to be rude. Who Cares? Obama has been nothing but ugly to us here in Louisiana. No more kiss face to the White House. I support Landry standing firm. Knowing Obama has an agenda straighty from Saul Alinsky’s book and is following it, we don’t need to show up and play his game. WE SAY NO AND MEAN NO!!!!
[...] I was, of course, on the side of the media types. Which is a bit unusual. I said that it was a mistake for Landry to have come on so strong in telling Obama off. For two reasons; that it was rude and wouldn’t look good, and also that it would create a distraction from the strong impression Republicans need to convey to the American public that while some of the policy choices in the Ryan plan might not be as easy and fun as folks might like at least the GOP is serious about the budget – and Obama is not. You’ve got to go to the meetings to give the impression that you’re serious, particularly when almost all the other House Republicans are going. [...]
[...] Much has been said about my respectful refusal of the President’s invitation to the White House to discuss raising the debt ceiling from its current level of $14.3 trillion. [...]
Good for Landry – we have all heard too many of his speech promising cr_p. It is Obama himself who has be-littled the presidency. And nearly half of our deepwater fleet has departed!!