The Hayride

Who The Heck Is Vance McAllister?

Who The Heck Is Vance McAllister?
October 20
00:19 2013

The Neil Riser camp is celebrating tonight, having led the 14-man field in the special election for the 5th District congressional seat vacated by Rodney Alexander’s acceptance of the veterans’ affairs secretary position in state government.

But Riser, who scored 32 percent of the vote and garnered a 14-point margin over the second-place finisher, might be playing with fire in the runoff. That’s because he’s up against a relatively unknown self-funded candidate named Vance McAllister, who pulled off a major surprise by gathering 18 percent of the vote.

The top Democrat in the race was Monroe mayor Jamie Mayo, at 15 percent. Democrats combined for an atrocious 30 percent of the vote in a district which sits right at 50 percent Democrat registration. That party’s horrific performance is one of the key stories of Saturday’s results.

Another of the key stories was the lackluster showing by Clyde Holloway. The former congressman and current Public Service Commissioner from Forest Hill was regarded as the likeliest Republican runoff partner with Riser, but Holloway ran a poor fourth place with just 11 percent of the vote.

But McAllister becomes an interesting candidate against Riser, the state senator from Columbia who has been the favorite all along. Riser has been the victim throughout the race of a perception on the part of many that he benefited from a bargain between Alexander and Gov. Bobby Jindal, in which in exchange for Alexander agreeing to vacate his seat early and open up a special election to Riser’s advantage the congressman would get a fairly cushy state job that would enable him to bank a sizable double pension from both the federal and state governments.

Everybody involved denies that deal took place, but it’s a sore spot that has clearly affected Riser’s appeal in the district – he has a resume and a voting record which should make him a no-brainer for the seat given his strong ties to the agricultural community, his identification as one of the most solid gun-rights supporters in the state legislature and his strong name recognition.

And with Riser polling just 32 percent, there is some room for a contender – particularly one with the ability to appeal to the district’s Democrat vote – to move ahead of him.

McAllister has so far run a campaign which would make him appeal to conservatives. He’s said welfare recipients shouldn’t make more on the dole than they could get from minimum-wage jobs, opposes gay marriage and abortion, wants to investigate the IRS and pledges to shrink the size of government.

His web ad…

McAllister can do the “I’m a businessman, not a politician” thing as well. He owns a a pipeline construction company, runs multiple Subway franchises and promotes wrestling and mixed martial arts events – which makes him a difficult target for Riser; often when businessmen run for political office there’s an angle to attack. But McAllister doesn’t have any apparent sweetheart government contracts to mine for campaign dirt. He looks like a complete outsider.

McAllister also has an interesting hook, in that he’s good friends with and has been endorsed by Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty fame. That counts for a great deal in the 5th District, since the Duck Dynasty crowd is practically royalty there.

But from an article in the Monroe News-Star about McAllister comes something Riser can use in a policy argument…

McAllister said his views are almost exclusively conservative. He said he would vote to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act if given a chance but is realistic.

“I think we’re honestly past that,” he said. “So if we know we have to live with it, let’s make it livable. Find the things that don’t work and fix them.”

He said he’s heard other candidates say they’re aren’t going to Washington to make friends, “but I do plan to go there and build relationships that will make me more effective,” he said. “That’s what wrong; it’s too partisan.”

Riser could call McAllister “soft on Obamacare,” and use his decidedly squishy position on it to question his seriousness on policy. But there’s a problem; namely, that while better than two-thirds of the district is voting conservative, the one-third which pulled the lever for Democrats or third parties could be what decides the race. And by staking out a position too far to the right even on Obamacare, Riser could marginalize himself.

Another item Riser can and should use is the fact McAllister was late filing campaign finance reports before Saturday’s primary

But, while [McAllister challenged] the integrity of incumbent politicans in Washington and Baton Rouge, Riser reiterated the importance of timely campaign finance reports.

As of Saturday, McAllister’s filings hadn’t shown up on the Federal Elections Commission website. Riser said the delay in “any other candidate’s” filing should be questioned. Calls and emails to the McAllister campaign on the issue were not returned.

If that filing isn’t remedied relatively early next week, Riser can and should cry foul and accuse McAllister of a lack of transparency.

To which McAllister would likely respond by bringing up the Jindal-Alexander bargain accusation.

This being a Republican-on-Republican fight in which scant differences can be found along ideological lines, it’s likely to be a nasty and personal contest from here on in. Let’s hope we’re spared that and the runoff campaign is illuminating rather than distasteful.

Related Articles

9 Comments

  1. Ted Baldwin
    Ted Baldwin October 20, 16:01

    i keep hearing that we have to live with ACA and there is nothing we can do about it. aca is flawed and unworkable. no one is signing up. it is a failure by incompetence or design. it will be painful to fight it but not as painful as letting it eat away at us.

  2. Ross Little
    Ross Little October 21, 16:42

    Hey Ted Baldwin. I totally agree. Obamacare is the gateway to socialism in all aspects of life. It grants the IRS enormous power and will find its way into everything.

  3. Thomas F Sisson
    Thomas F Sisson October 21, 18:50

    I'm not in the fifth district but would not vote for anyone who doesn't pledge to completely repel Obamacare

  4. Fontenot Pacer
    Fontenot Pacer October 22, 09:22

    If a law is made it can be unmade. Prohibition was Constitutional for 12 years. Then it was repealed. That was an Amendment to the constitution. Yeah, I would thnik Obamacare can be done away with.

  5. Helen Simon
    Helen Simon October 23, 13:22

    McAllister has a huge advantage, and the reason that DD has endorsed him…JESUS CHRIST..in case you haven't noticed, the ONLY principled Conservatives are Christians. This is a huge advantage, and also that he's Moon's friend.;)

  6. Paul Crane
    Paul Crane November 03, 00:22

    Neil Riser is also Moon's friend. I just feel that any person who is an incumbent or has formerly held any political office right now will have a very hard time in getting elected to any office at this time. Rodney Alexander voted for every debt ceiling increase since he went to Washington. Then he has Jindal's endorsement and for those who see what the real story is recognize that as the sure sign we do not need. Jindal is nothing more than a RINO. If one would just listen to him they would see that he now is even changing his positions on the moral issues that are the only main separation of the two parties at this time. Just for the ones who think there is separation of church and state right would benefit themselves greatly to make a trip to the Monument to the Forefathers in Plymouth, MA. There they can see first hand the very statements these men made while they were involved in the writing of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution., They also can very clearly see their hopes, dreams, wishes and prayers for this Nation was to always be seeking the guidance from God himself on how we are to live as a civilized society.

  7. Anonymous
    Anonymous April 07, 23:48

    Representative McAllister! The penalty is clear! It's in the Bible: "And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." You claim to be a man of faith. Well, time to put up or shut up. You are a supporter of the death penalty, yes?

  8. Anonymous
    Anonymous April 07, 23:48

    Representative McAllister! The penalty is clear! It's in the Bible: "And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." You claim to be a man of faith. Well, time to put up or shut up. You are a supporter of the death penalty, yes?

Only registered users can comment.

Subscribe To The Nooner!

Categories

Archives