Louisiana has long been a cornerstone of American commerce, with freight railroads serving as a critical backbone of our economy. From energy and agriculture to chemicals and exports moving through our ports, rail connects Louisiana’s workers and industries to national and global markets. That is why efforts in Congress to revive sweeping rail mandates – whether through legislation introduced by Pennsylvania Congressman Chris Deluzio or by quietly inserting similar provisions into the upcoming surface transportation reauthorization – should raise serious concerns for our state.

As Congress begins work on the next transportation bill, Louisiana lawmakers are expected to play an outsized leadership role in shaping the package. That influence should be used to protect affordability, competitiveness, and economic growth – not to reopen failed policy debates that would impose costly, top-down rail regulations with little evidence they would improve safety.

Proposals modeled on the so-called Railway Safety Act would do exactly that. They would layer new federal mandates onto an industry that is already heavily regulated, highly capital-intensive, and continuously investing in safety improvements. For Louisiana, where roughly a quarter of state revenues are tied to energy and where rail supports everything from grain exports to petrochemicals, the stakes could not be higher.

Any disruption to rail operations – whether through prescriptive crew rules, arbitrary train limits, or inflexible operating mandates – would ripple quickly across our economy. Delays and higher costs would hit refineries, manufacturers, farmers, and port operators first, and Louisiana families would ultimately pay the price through higher energy costs and more expensive consumer goods.

This moment also matters nationally. President Donald Trump and his administration have made affordability a defining priority – recognizing that regulatory overreach drives up costs for households already under pressure. Reviving expansive rail mandates runs directly counter to that goal. It also conflicts with the administration’s broader push for deregulation and regulatory modernization, which aims to reduce unnecessary costs while maintaining strong safety outcomes through innovation and risk-based oversight.

Safety and efficiency are not opposing values. America’s freight railroads have steadily improved safety through investment in infrastructure, advanced inspection technology, automation, and data-driven operations. These gains have come not from rigid federal mandates, but from flexibility that allows railroads to tailor solutions to specific risks and operating environments.

Blanket legislation – often backed by organized labor interests and extending well beyond recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board – would undermine that progress. Mandates covering crew size, train length, speed, and equipment ignore the diversity of rail operations and threaten to slow freight movement across the country, with Louisiana bearing disproportionate harm due to its role as an export and energy hub.

As Congress debates the next transportation bill, lawmakers should resist the temptation to relitigate these issues. Surface transportation reauthorization should focus on infrastructure investment, supply-chain resilience, and economic competitiveness – not on inserting controversial rail provisions that have repeatedly failed to advance on their own merits.

Louisiana’s leaders have both the responsibility and the leverage to ensure the transportation bill strengthens – not weakens – our economy. That means rejecting heavy-handed rail mandates, standing up for affordability and regulatory discipline, and supporting a pragmatic approach that advances safety without derailing growth.

The path forward is collaboration, innovation, and smart oversight, not sweeping mandates that threaten the lifelines of Louisiana’s economy.