CHAD ROGERS: Wow! Mary Landrieu Discovers Capitalism!
CHAD ROGERS: Wow! Mary Landrieu Discovers Capitalism! – ChadRogers.net
This option will reset the home page of The Hayride restoring closed widgets and categories.
Reset The Hayride homepageCHAD ROGERS: Wow! Mary Landrieu Discovers Capitalism! – ChadRogers.net
This post was written by MacAoidh on Thursday, May 12, 2011, 8:36. MacAoidh has written 8071 posts on this blog.
“What happened here was the accumulated karmic backlash of forty years’ worth of Establishment Democrats telling the Activist Left that they were the vanguard of, and spokesmen for, a broad American populist movement. For the longest time, such lies were simply an accepted part of the public policy debate; mostly because the country had no yardstick by which to judge the Left’s turnout and activities.
“But then came the Tea Parties — which showed people what a real American populist movement looks like, and what it can do — and its success stung the Activist Left at the exact moment that Scott Walker came along and not unreasonably decided that if he was elected on a platform of doing certain things, he had best start doing them. This infuriated the Left, but not as much as the refusal of Walker and the WI GOP to go weak-kneed at the first sign of push-back. So… the recall movement was born!
“And… fizzled. The Left should have cut their losses when Prosser demonstrated that drum circles and illegal indoor camping in the Rotunda didn’t translate into votes… and they definitely should have cut their losses when the first wave of recalls didn’t live up to the hype. But they didn’t, and now the people of Wisconsin are increasingly demonstrating that they’re tired of all of this – and they’re not blaming the Republicans, either. Such a shame, but that’s what you get whe- hey! The bacon’s fully cooked.”
- Moe Lane
Bad Behavior has blocked 3812 access attempts in the last 7 days.
@chad:disqus: No one should ever think Mary ain’t smart when it comes to politics. She got to where she is today by all her political lying and posturing. As for ‘Big Oil’, they have plenty of pols in their vest pockets and this story is proof in the puddin’.
Proof: As you said, ‘big oil’ pays 40% in taxes while businesses like computer companies pay 20%. She knows that by pushing to raise the taxes on the ‘other’ companies to match what ‘big oil’ pays ain’t what ‘big oil’ wants. Big Oil wants to lower the tax burden so they can put more in their pockets. So they call up Ms Mary and tell her they need a break on the taxes and ‘suggest’ how it should be done. Not only does the tax break sound good to the Big Oilers but the citizen population thinks it’s great also, cause that will lower the price of gas at the pump. So Ms Mary sees the positive in this deal…. lower the tax for Big Oil– makes them happy…. makes the voters happy cause they get a couple of cents off a gallon of gas… makes the ‘other’ companies happy cause they don’t have to pay higher taxes…. WOW win/win/win!!!!!
But we all know that in her liberal heart she wants to raise the tax for the ‘other’ companies, that’s the liberal way. It’s about making money not about saving the tax payer’s money. But then she is up for reelection and needs to start campaigning and what a way to start.
Wave the green in her face and she’ll assume the position you want.