Fatima & Russia: The Consecration Question the World Must Rediscover

Mockingbird media and the world that listens are ignoring the point that geopolitics can’t be understood without religion.

That is the first mistake, the last mistake, and every mistake in between.

Trump, the Media, and Something for Conservatives to Consider

Drone Strikes, Iran, and False Flag Readiness

The latest back-and-forth inside allegedly disparate stories involving Iran, Ukraine, Russia, ceasefires, shipping routes, oil markets, and “influence operations,” as Zelensky recently put it, has the same dizzying effect that marks so much of modern information war. One day the public is told peace has been achieved through Trump. The next day the same conflict appears to be boiling over again because of Trump. One report says negotiators are preparing to sit down for more… negotiating. Another tells us the players are already sliding back into escalation. The public is asked to follow the bouncing ball of this diabolical tennis match as though each headline is the one that finally explains the whole story.

In other words, did anyone really believe true peace had been achieved a week or two ago when the latest promise of peace was doing its circulating work?

Does anyone know exactly which one we’re referencing?

This morning’s newest contradiction only sharpens that point. Trump is now touting another round of talks in Doha, while Iran is publicly denying that negotiations with the United States are scheduled at any level, even as it acknowledges technical discussions connected to the existing agreement. In other words, the public hears “talks,” then “no talks,” then “technical discussions,” then “ceasefire,” then “renewed escalation,” and is still expected to approach each new headline with full belief, to treat each one as though it clarifies what the last headline irrevocably muddied.

Meanwhile, Ukraine is reportedly preparing a new pressure and “influence” campaign against Russia.

That word, “influence,” should not pass by unnoticed, especially for readers who have followed our work on Ukraine, the biolabs, and the binary trap that was set early in the war: Russia as pure villain, Ukraine as untouchable moral darling, and every serious question treated as baseless conspiracy theory. Nor is Eastern Europe itself moving toward obvious calm, with the Ukraine war continuing to reshape the continent’s security posture.

No wonder people stop even trying and start looking forward to LSU football again.

We have seen this pattern too many times now to pretend it is merely poor journalism or that the so-called conspiracy theorists were merely lucky. This is the doctrinal warfare program operating on the human mind, forming categories and tribes before evidence can be weighed on social media, virtue signaling before facts can be examined, and then revealing parts of the truth only later when it doesn’t matter to anyone anymore. Increasingly, it is resembling the Revelation of the Method, the late and managed unveiling of realities after they have already irrevocably shaped public belief and behavior.

The Narrative and Fatima

For Catholics, providentially we hope, especially Catholics who still take grandma’s talks on the history of Our Lady’s apparitions at Fatima seriously, there is a stabilizing anchor beneath it all. In 1917, mere days after the apparitions at Fatima had reached their conclusion, the Russian (Bolshevik) Revolution erupted and began reshaping the modern world in ways too many Catholics were never taught to articulate. The warning about Russia spreading her errors throughout the world did not stem from a static warning about the country of Russia indefinitely, nor did it float in some whimsical devotional atmosphere of a year only the old and the dying should appreciate. It was attached to a real historical and geopolitical rupture, one that would help unleash atheistic materialism, never-ending revolution, perpetual class warfare, state worship, Mockingbird propaganda, and a whole anti-Christian belief in man and his relationship to both society here and salvation to come.

Then, in 1929, at Tuy, the promised more specific command concerning Russia was made:

… It was here in Tuy that Our Lady’s promise contained in the Secret of July 13, 1917 was fulfilled: “I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia….”

Sister Lucy describes the communication:

(June 13, 1929)

…Finding myself alone one night, I knelt down near the Communion rail, in the middle of the chapel….

Suddenly, the whole chapel lit up with a supernatural light and on the altar appeared a cross of light which reached the ceiling. In a clearer light, on the upper part of the cross, could be seen the face of a man with His body to the waist, on His chest a dove, equally luminous; and nailed to the cross, the body of another man. A little below the waist [of Christ on the cross], suspended in the air, could be seen a Chalice and a large Host, onto which some drops of Blood were falling, which flowed from the face of the Crucified One and from the wound in His breast. Running down over the Host, these drops fell into the Chalice.

Under the right arm of the cross was Our Lady with Her Immaculate Heart in Her hand… (She appeared as Our Lady of Fatima, with Her Immaculate Heart in Her left hand, without sword or roses, but with a crown of thorns and flames) under the left arm [of the cross], in large letters… forming these words: “Grace and Mercy”. I understood that the mystery of the Most Holy Trinity was shown to me, and I received lights about this mystery which I am not permitted to reveal.

Then Our Lady said to me: ‘The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means. So numerous are the souls which the justice of God condemns for sins committed against Me, that I come to ask for reparation. Sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.’

I rendered an account of this to my confessor, who ordered me to write down what Our Lord willed to be done.

The request at Tuy was especially distinguished by the role the Bishops of the Church, and specifically the Holy Father, were to have in God’s plan for peace. The faithful had been instructed in their role of prayer and sacrifice in the apparitions at Fatima. At Tuy, however, the Pope is given the primary responsibility for future peace: “God asks the Holy Father….” In 1917 the Holy Father had asked the Blessed Mother to obtain the peace of the world and, like a loving mother, She readily consented, but on the condition of the Holy Father’s and the Church’s faithful cooperation with Her plan.

All of this is paramount to understand as we move toward 2029, the hundred-year anniversary of the command of God through Our Lady. Catholics who know the Sacred Heart’s history—and quite likely why it has been obscured in favor of the less demanding and less prophetic “Divine Mercy” devotion—should feel the weight of that approaching date. Christ requested, which means commanded, through Saint Margaret Mary, that France be consecrated to His Sacred Heart in 1689. That command was delayed and effectively refused by the French monarchy. A hundred years later, in 1789, the French Revolution broke open the old order, and a few years after that the king of France fell beneath the blade.

It is an aspect of the French Revolution that most American Catholics don’t even know—because the school textbooks never included it.

Here is a part of that story, “The Revelation at Rianjo”:

…Thus it happened that on an unspecified day in August 1931, Sister Lucia was in the town’s chapel dedicated to Our Lady of Guadalupe, praying fervently for the conversion of Russia. Two years and two months had already passed since Heaven’s formal and dramatic request was given for the Pope and all of the Catholic bishops of the world to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. This occurred on June 13, 1929 in the Trinitarian vision at Tuy. It had received virtually no response from the Church’s hierarchy.

Our Lord complained to Sister Lucia of His ministers’ delay in executing His command, warning them at the same time of the terrible fate awaiting them on account of their disobedience. Sister Lucia reported this important revelation to her bishop….

“‘Make it known to My ministers, given that they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, they will likewise follow him into misfortune. It is never too late to have recourse to Jesus and Mary.’”

…Our Lord was here making an explicit reference to the request of the Sacred Heart given to the King of France through Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque on June 17, 1689. Our Lord asked Louis XIV… to consecrate France to His Sacred Heart, promising in return to save France from its enemies. Louis XIV, Louis XV, and Louis XVI, following the unfortunate and unworthy advice of their Jesuit confessors, did not perform this consecration. As a result of this century-long refusal, the French monarchy and the whole of France’s Catholic society were overthrown… in the course of the bloody terror of the French Revolution.

On June 17, 1789, exactly one hundred years to the day from when Saint Margaret Mary had been given that revelation of the great designs of Heaven for France, the Third Estate rose up and proclaimed itself the National Assembly, stripping King Louis XVI of his legislative authority. A mere four years later, on January 21, 1793, the revolutionaries sent the King to his death on the guillotine as if he were a common criminal.

…Jesus warns us that this dark chapter of history will repeat itself, and this time the ministers of His Church will be prominent among its hapless victims. It would appear that this mass organized execution of the Pope, together with other bishops, priests, religious and laity – as if they were common criminals – is what is foretold in the vision of Fatima released on June 26, 2000.

It is not unreasonable to suspect that the “ante has been raised”. In 1689 it was a consecration to the Sacred Heart, in 1929 it was a consecration to the Immaculate Heart. In 1689, God asked for the consecration of France, the largest country in Christendom. In 1929, God asked for the consecration of Russia, the largest nation in the world and one far larger than France. In 1689, God asked the French king to make the consecration, the most powerful monarch in Christendom. In 1929, God asked the Pope together with all the bishops to make the consecration, the greatest authority in the world and one far above every French king. If a century of disobeying Heaven resulted in the French Revolution bringing great destruction to France and all of Europe, what might a century of disobeying Heaven result in – now that the stakes have been raised?

Note: Much of this article is adapted from https://fatima.org/about/fatima-the-facts/the-apparition-at-rianjo-1931/

Certainly there will be those who will not take something like this seriously. But we should be very careful about laughing off such parallels, particularly if you read the Bible with the sole notion of culling the mind of God over the span of salvation history. Will something absolutely “happen” in 2029 or 2030? There’s no way to know that. But we all know something is coming, and it would do all of us well to consider such prophecy as a motivator to get our affairs of soul in line.

After all, no one is promised to get to 2029, or even to tomorrow.

Modern leaders speak constantly of peace, but increasingly it all seems managed, curated, and controlled. War is treated as business as usual, a malfunction to be handled by men in suits or field gear, while the same class of men who benefit from disorder present themselves as the only ones competent enough to manage it. It is the Hegelian dialectic yet again, and souls should be cautious when every headline is made to feel like the final headline.

We are not being informed by the news.

We are being formed by it.

And through it all, even the Biblical conflict in the Middle East, Russia keeps appearing like a tiger waiting in the weeds.

One might ask what Russia has to do with the Bible. And I would point him to the fact that not all Russias are the same. Most likely, Our Lady meant something very specific, something very unique, perhaps something even related to that Middle East, when she said “Russia.”

Final Words

For Catholics who refuse to accept the lame and insulting blow-off Fatima was given in the early 2000s, this is where the geopolitical meets the prophetic. Our Lady did not speak in the shameless and soft language of modern diplomacy. She said Russia would spread her errors, that wars and persecutions would follow, and that the only appropriate response would involve reparation, penance, the Rosary, and the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Too many Catholics have accepted the convenient explanation that the matter has already been settled in some generalized, harmless, good-enough way. That may have soothed many fears almost thirty years ago now, but it never satisfied the plain force of the command. God shall not be mocked—not with empty Vatican releases and not with the passage of time.

Russia was named because Russia was central to the warning.

Particularly a certain faction inside Russia, which may or may not include Vladimir Putin.

That is why anyone still willing to speak seriously about this deserves attention, especially a Catholic shepherd. In an age when so many churchmen are into diplomacy and dialogue instead of biblically based Marian warnings, a bishop or priest who brings Catholics back to Fatima is reminding the faithful that the world’s political upheaval has spiritual, cosmic roots.

This is why the Hildebrand question must keep coming up until bishops debunk it lawfully, regardless of where one finally lands on the claim itself. Catholics may recoil at the controversy, or actually may not even know about it beyond this digital space, but they should not recoil at the substance of the agenda being presented: Consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, denounce Agenda 2030, and prepare for the 2000th anniversary of the Redemption of the World.

The world is preparing man for Agenda 2030, something many a pundit and prophet is talking about. Heaven, one might say, is calling Catholics to prepare for the anniversary of the Redemption, even though you may hear not a single priest talking about it. One program points toward managed humanity through global institutions, digital systems, controlled language, and permanent engineered slavery. The other points back to the Blood of Christ, the Cross, penance, reparation, and the Kingship of Our Lord over nations as well as souls.

And there, some meaning of “Russia” is right in the middle of it all.

That collision is obviously not small. And it should be obviously more important than any plans we have for ourselves and our families at this very moment in time.

No, no one has to pretend he knows exactly what 2029 will bring. But no serious Catholic should pretend the date is meaningless either.

As the world talks about Agenda 2030, a Catholic voice—true papal claimant or not—is again saying what Rome should have been saying all along but rejected decisively in the mid-twentieth century: Consecrate Russia, reject the new order of the world, and prepare for the anniversary of the Redemption, for the much-belated crowning of Christ as King.

We may not all be Catholic, but it nonetheless is the ignored Catholic frame beneath the politics, beneath the headlines.

This modern world, even the new Catholic one, keeps trying to negotiate around the command.

Perhaps that is why the same story keeps spinning in a freefall.

The question is not whether Russia will keep appearing in the news.

The question is whether Catholics will rediscover why Russia was named.

The Narrative and Fatima

Final Words

Trending on The Hayride