There’s a reason they don’t want you looking too closely at the past.
Because the past has a way of exposing the present.
The assassination of JFK has involved conspiracy theories for so long that it has become an industry all unto itself. Books, documentaries, exposés—some serious, some absurd, all circling the same central notion: The official story the government-media apparatus released is nonsense.
But here’s the fun part—something has shifted.
The same voices that used to scoff at the idea of a deep-state coup in 1963 are suddenly a little less smug-save for some who are continuing to double down or enjoying the fact that, poof!, the story has trickled away again. The same folks and institutions that swore Oswald was just a lone nut are now, ever so carefully, admitting that maybe, just maybe, there was more to the story–all the while benefitting from, again, the magical disappearance act of what should be the story being discussed.
Here’s the saving grace of a supposed loss, however: Every story is the same story. Every villain is the same villain. Every end is the same end. It is why the JFK story is important–because it shows the longevity, the sinisterly patient longevity that goes well beyond 1963–of America’s root enemy.
That’s why they want it to disappear.
But I won’t let it disappear, not for the few followers I have who know I’ve been covering these types of stories and their narrative arc for a long time. If you’ve noticed, I’ve shifted my attention ever so slightly—while still engaging in the convergence of seemingly disparate stories on the information battlefield—to the existence of “conservative” social media influencers making their name and a whole lot of money in the regime gatekeeping business.
See my recent work for more context linked below.
The Other Side of the Media Monster
For years, conservatives thought the media was simply biased. That it leaned left. That it was a little unfair, then wholly unfair, and now just going extinct because….Trump won and “we’re taking our country back.” What they didn’t understand—what many still refuse to understand—is that the media isn’t just slanted. It’s part of the machine. And that machine isn’t just pro-Democrat; it’s pro-regime.
If they have plans for a totalitarian world we’ve gotten only a glimpse of with the Covid-19 and jab rollout, do we not think they will have also secured a voice on the other side of the script? Ever see the movie Sleepers?
Ever see what Bolshevik Revolution character Vladimir Lenin had to say?
By the way, do you know who the Bolsheviks actually were?
This is the other side of the media monster: the so-called “conservative” influencers who exist not to fight the system, but to manage the opposition to it.
They prey on Americans’ calcified penchant for aligning themselves with either Tribe A or Tribe B. It is a classic Communist tactic, one that is encapsulated in a figure I have referred to frequently in my work—Saul Alinsky.
You may have a hunch as to exactly who these gatekeepers are.
They’re the ones who tell you that, yes, the deep state is bad, but let’s not get carried away. The ones who are always just a little too eager to dismiss serious questions as “conspiracy theories.” Or the ones who will talk about “election integrity” but won’t go anywhere near what happened in 2020. Or the ones who made sure you never, ever asked questions about January 6.
Sometimes the word isn’t “or.” It’s “and.”
And, of course, the ones who scoff at those sincerely investigating the JFK files, those already released years ago and those of the recent variety, and having the gall to notice a very distinct pattern of culpability that goes beyond “C-I-A,” even as the government itself starts admitting there was a cover-up.
Even as Trump himself said just the other day, in his typical suggestive way to avoid a media backlash and to invite us to our own discovery, that the files show that Lee Harvey Oswald “had help.”
It’s not about left and right, D and R. It’s about, quite frankly, truth and everything else.
It’s also about inside and outside. And these people, these “conservatives”? They’re on the inside.
What Are They Actually Conserving?
Ben Shapiro is a smart guy. We all know it. He speaks quickly, debates well, and sounds logical—right up until you notice the patterns. Right up until you start asking the wrong questions.
Why is he always on the side of “the system” when it actually matters?
I also invite you to visit Mr Shapiro’s Wikipedia page, particularly under the heading “Donald Trump.”
Remember, conservative gatekeepers will say a lot of things in agreement with you—like on the topic of gender insanity (duh!) and the price of eggs. That’s part of the trick.
Why was Shapiro so dismissive of election fraud in 2020 when so much evidence said otherwise? Why does he reflexively defend institutions that have proven, over and over, that they exist to destroy actual conservatives?
And most recently, why has he scoffed at the release of the JFK files? Here is a pull from one of my articles last week:
Fast forward to today, and Mockingbird never really stopped. It just evolved. Social media, fact-checkers, and corporate media outlets all work in tandem to discredit anything that challenges the official story. Most conservatives know that much.
But perhaps the most nefarious evolution it underwent is its cultivation of controlled opposition precisely from the conservative side. There are trusted conservative voices out there–popular ones that were never de-platformed or shadow-banned as The Hayride and RVIVR were–that will agree with you on the low hanging fruit (like gender insanity duh), but when it comes to the truly earth and soul changing issue begging to be broached, they’ll mislead. They’ll abandon the “conspiracy theorist” and mock them, inviting their adoring fans to do the same. And they do it because the binary trap has been shifted. It’s not us vs the legacy media like CNN or MSNBC anymore; they are going extinct and everyone knows it. The new false dichotomy is conservative vs “conspiracy theorist,” and it is just as wicked. If you question the TRUE origins of a war, the legitimacy of elections or WHO actually controls them, or WHO actually comprise the intelligence agencies in domestic and foreign affairs, you’re labeled a conspiracy theorist and shunned to the same realm where Rachel Maddow once roamed.
They double down and say there’s no evidence! Even though we just got a truck load of it. The problem is clear–people have been so brainwashed in our propagandic, public education system that for still too many, inductive and deductive reasoning is quite plainly anathema to us. Well-meaning people believe voices like this because the JFK docs don’t say–exactly–the words “______ killed JFK.”
Ben Shapiro is one of those conservative voices on which I would caution. Remember, I would agree with most of what he typically says too. It is why I am consistently saying to learn how to separate good messages from the messenger–from a messenger that could one day lead us astray:
But here’s the thing, Ben: The “conspiracies” keep turning out to be true. And more and more people know who and what you are.
Not to mention you belittle the fact that 1963 was so long ago and why should we care, when your people continue to beat the 1940s drum ad nauseum any time anyone questions the State of Israel or why so many of our politicians have dual-citizenship or why so much foreign lobby money goes to them. I mean, we’re supposed to live in a continual state of horror at what we were told happened in the early 1940s, but you can’t be bothered with who killed a sitting US President twenty years later?
Note what he says about “conspiracy theories.” This is a classic shaming tactic of Communism as a way to silence opposition.
What risk is there in the contents of the files and Ben Shapiro’s identity?
What does he have to lose?
Can we not at least have a conversation about certain words that pop up time and time again–and time and time again–in those files?
This is the role of the controlled opposition Communists deploy as a sort of military tactic in a war for our minds. It’s a tactic to induce the mass psychosis we see permeating our society—both political and cultural. Why do you think we look back at things like the 1980s or 1950s and think, “How did things change so much?”
It happened because people fall asleep. And they fall asleep based on very real war principles deployed by the enemy. One of those principles: To corral conservatives into safe, ineffective conversations (if they only stay stagnant there, of course), like boys in girls’ bathrooms, egg prices, and SNAP. They make sure we’re always debating in ways that don’t actually threaten the power structure.
Then when Trump wins and starts signing executive orders against those things, we go under the impression that we are winning.
I mean, we are, but only if we also see the ruse. We’re not winning if we go back to sleep and assume everything is fine and dandy now that the boss is back in charge.
What happens when people start questioning the Kennedy assassination, something of real import as an apt complement to the smaller things?
The gatekeepers step in to put us back to sleep.
When the court of public opinion on election fraud starts to become an avalanche?
They step in there too.
When Trump signs an executive order on election integrity just this week, dragging the issue back into the light?
If they do it with this as well, don’t let them. We’re more equipped and weaponized cognitively now than we ever have been.
LEJEUNE RECENT WORK
The Narrative War
What do they actually fear?
They don’t fear Trump. They don’t fear Kennedy truther-conspiracy theorists that have been talking about this for much longer than I have.
They fear exposure that reaches the tipping point. See Malcolm Gladwell.
They fear you.
They fear you seeing the patterns. They fear you making connections you were never supposed to make. They fear you realizing that it was never about JFK, or Trump, or any one moment in history—it was always about the system itself and those who periodically pop up to shatter it.
Once you unmask the villain in a Scooby-Doo episode, their ruse is up.
Because once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
The same machine that took down JFK is the same machine that tries to take down your valid opinion on these ever-eternal matters. The same media that lied about Oswald is the same media that lies about everything else. And the same gatekeepers who kept conservatives trapped in useless, toothless debates for decades are the same ones telling you not to go down the rabbit hole about JFK now.
It’ll happen with 9/11 too eventually. Do you think those “conspiracies” will stay on the fringe forever?
It’s too late. Too many people know.
I could be wrong on Shapiro, and I know a lot of you probably listen to him. He may just be misguided at times. His opinions may simply be wrong at times. And I definitely understand the need for all of us to have mercy on our brethren, as the sign-off to every one of my articles says.
But at the very least, we have to understand the reality of Communist psychological warfare. We have to be aware of the possibilities if not likelihoods. The gatekeeper’s job isn’t to fight the system alongside you. It’s to be close enough to you to keep you trapped inside it.
May everyone named directly or referenced indirectly ask forgiveness and do penance for their sins against America and God. I fight this information war in the spirit of justice and love for the innocent, but I have been reminded of the need for mercy and prayers for our enemies. I am a sinner in need of redemption as well after all, for my sins are many. In the words of Jesus Christ himself, Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do.
