HARTMAN: A Titular Offense In Berkeley

Ah, Berkeley!  What would we do without you?

A proposal pending before the City Council in what is arguably California’s most ridiculous municipality – and that’s an accomplishment – would create gender equality by allowing women to go topless on the streets.

Yeah.  Well.  Some of you are probably saying, “Woo-hoo!” even though you’re about as likely to set foot in Berkeley and lay eyes on that flagrant boobage as I am to see burqas in Tehran.  But, dudes and uber-liberated or lesbian ladies, seriously?

OK, fine.  Let’s have people of both sexes (and all genders) be free to walk around topless all the time.  Fine by me.  As a libertarian-leaning Republican, I honestly don’t care.  Seriously.  Flap your breasticles in the wind, and it’s no skin off my nose, butt, whatever.  I’m not easily offended.  To frame this as a gender-equality issue, however, is just kind of silly.

We are all born with physical traits that not only define us, but restrict us.  My friend Todd cannot drive a car because of an innate disability that confines him to a wheelchair.  My friend Marshall will be forever “overqualified” for a job at Walgreen’s because of his inborn intellect and education.  I will never be a professional tennis player because of a badly curved spine that came along with being merely alive (and having been born in a military hospital).  As a man, I can wear a skirt if I want but I can’t do so without taking certain steps to protect my junk from injury, mosquitoes, whatever.  My large-breasted sister can’t move about without a bra, lest she injure her back more than three pregnancies already have.  My bald brother has to wear a hat in the sun.

Biology is a thing.

If we accept it, if we accept inborn biology as liberals demand that we do, if we embrace that we are born straight or gay, cis-gendered or transgender – hell, even male or female – we must also accept the limitations that come with such ascribed traits, along with their benefits.  We must also accept that with every ascribed trait there are both benefits and limitations.

I have white privilege.  I have male privilege.  I get that.  Really, I do.  I didn’t choose either, so I can moderate my behavior in sensitivity to both.  I can also, should I choose, walk about shirtless without drawing the attention of the police – not that anyone would enjoy seeing me in such an unclothed state.

If the Berkeley City Council votes to allow women to be shirtless in public, that’s fine. I honestly don’t care.  I’m not likely to ever be there anyway.  If they try to supersede California state obscenity law, however, they may have a costly and time-consuming rumble on their hands – and for what?  Will it be worth the fight?  Will the dozen or so women who actually WANT to walk about bare-chested benefit from this?  Will they feel more “equal?”

If they do, God help them.  There are far more worthy concerns, for them and for all of us.

Interested in more national news? We've got you covered! See More National News
Previous Article
Next Article
Join the Conversation - Download the Speakeasy App.

Trending on The Hayride